Sure, man. FG-3pt-FT by Month: November: 44-13-79 December: 42-15-65 January: 57-23-69 February: 40-25-80 March: 53-44-76 In the conference tourney and NCAA tourney combined: 7 games 52-96 FGs 54% 5-12 3pt 42% 42-57 FTA 74% NCAA Tourney, 4 games: 50-29-78
That's better than he shot on the season, which would, at least in part, make the point: he's not as bad as people are pretending - and he did improve as the season progressed.
If its trading down between 3-5, youre still getting a possible star. Its not like anyone suggesting trading to 10th/20th or something like that....i used the 11th for 10th just to show how much value you can get even that far down, id imagine its even more value even if trading just from 3 to 2....heres a better example, Orl traded #1 (webber) for #3 (penny) and 3 or 4 future 1st rd picks, i forgot that orl did with those future 1st but they still a star themselves in penny even by trading from #1
Chris Webber (85 career win shares) was traded for picks that became... Penny (62 career win shares) Todd Fuller (2 career win shares) Vince Carter (122 career win shares) Chris Mihm (13 career win shares) Good trade, even if you don't like Win Shares.
Well if that's the case it's definitely worth considering, but that wasn't my original argument. You don't trade superior talent for two lesser talents is what I'm saying. As for the Penny trade, that could work when you have a transcendant talent like Shaq. A team in our position should select the best talent available.
Probably true, but I believe in our scouting department moreso than statistics involving past picks from disfunctional teams.
Look at all the drafts over the past decade. It's true that generally the value of the selection decreases, but surely the 3 and 4 is better than the 2. That establishes the theory. So the question becomes whether what we can get is better, too.
2 vs 5 + 10 since 1994 1994 - Jason Kidd vs Juwan Howard/Eddie Jones 1995 - Antonio Mcdyess vs Kevin Garnett/Kurt Thomas 1996 - Marcus Camby vs Ray Allen/Erick Dampier 1997 - Keith Van Horn vs Tony Battie/Danny Fortson 1998 - Mike Bibby vs Vince Carter/Paul Pierce 1999 - Steve Francis vs Jonathan Bender/Jason Terry 2000 - Stromile Swift vs Mike Miller/Keyon Dooling 2001 - Tyson Chandler vs Jason Richardson/Joe Johnson 2002- Jay Williams vs Nikoloz Tskitishvili/Caron Butler 2003 - Darko Milicic vs Dwayne Wade/Jarvis Hayes 2004 - Emeka Okafor vs Devin Harris/Luke Jackson 2005 - Marvin Williams vs Raymond Felton/Andrew Bynum 2006 - Lamarcus Aldridge vs Shelden Williams/Mouhamed Sene 2007 - Kevin Durant vs Jeff Green/Spencer Hawes 2008 - Michael Beasley vs Kevin Love/Brook Lopez 2009 - Hasheem Thabeet vs Ricky Rubio/Brandon Jennings 2010 - Evan Turner vs Demarcus Cousins/Paul George 2011 - Derrick Williams vs Jonas Valanciunas/Jimmer Fredette 2012 - Michael Kidd-Gilchrist vs Thomas Robinson/Austin Rivers 2013 - Victor Oladipo vs Alex Len/CJ McCollum 2014 - Jabari Parker vs Dante Exum/Elfrid Payton 2015 - D'Angelo Russell vs Mario Hezonja/Justise Winslow 2016 - Brandon Ingram vs Kris Dunn/Thon Maker Recent history says stay put, play the odds and you can draft DMC/PG or Love/Lopez in one draft.
I don't mind if we trade down if Boston picks someone other than Fultz. It pushes talent down nicely. But I don't see that happening and I'd rather stay put in general. This is also assuming the Kings even would be willing to move two lottery picks for one.
Last 4 out of 5 years (2013 I'd move back) it would be better to stay put. That's recent history for me.
I'd switch three of the last five. I like LA's picks. By the way, I'd rather have LA drafting twice in the top ten than almost any other team.
I thought the question was trading a player that had a 40% chance of becoming a star for 2 solid players (ie Perkins) that had no chance.