2026-27 Team Developments: Trades / Free Agents / News / Rumors / Ideas

Discussion in 'Lakers Discussion' started by TIME, Jun 14, 2026.

  1. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    34,411
    Likes Received:
    94,540
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Online
    gotta be. no way they're going to roll in just like this. they have the big TE and some picks. i've been expecting them to land murphy, but maybe NO is still doing...whatever they're doing down there...

    yeah, the compromise shouldn't be the QO, imo. or the QO should just be much higher. like, if you decide to protect the player via RFA, this must mean you value them, but watson's QO is 6.5m. denver may actually benefit tremendously from watson just signing the QO, as it would allow them time (maybe the full year) with their full roster AND while he'd be a UFA next year, they'd still have his bird rights--at a time when few teams have cap space. guessing eason's agent saw that writing on the wall and just took something over the mle.

    so yeah, if the QO, say, exceeded the mle, that might help a bit?
     
    432J likes this.
  2. LakeShowAZ

    LakeShowAZ - Lakers 6th Man -

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2017
    Messages:
    1,711
    Likes Received:
    4,200
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Online
    Snowtime Lakers all the way

    [​IMG]
     
    Julio and abeer3 like this.
  3. Savory Griddles

    Savory Griddles Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2014
    Messages:
    9,283
    Likes Received:
    22,903
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offline
    I think if you can get a second rounder for Bronny from Cleveland, that gives you 4 to package around Vando, Hardy and Knecht. It'd have to be to the Nets.

    Regardless, If 24 million is the contract offer to Watson, I think Denver matches.
     
    abeer3 likes this.
  4. abeer3

    abeer3 - Lakers Legend -

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    34,411
    Likes Received:
    94,540
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Online
    i think they do, but i think it opens the door for us to nab jones from them plus potentially another player or even to absorb some salary and picks in trade to replenish what went out, worst case. it's not like any of the outgoing players are going to be sorely missed, so it could be worth it just to take the swing.

    also, i don't want to see denver wriggle out of watson's FA like houston did with eason. on a truly open market, eason's getting a deal starting north of 20, imo, and watson's getting one starting around 25 (which is all he's asking, apparently).
     

Share This Page