he might here if you havent notice but than again you rarely watch anyway but has so much insight
yes cause more $ = more expectations n not "what he was doing or use to be"
you dont have to guess when it comes to AD
if reaves makes 40M/yr and constantly injured while half assing effort every few gms, most here would also get on his case
those team that rely on injury prone stars hasnt been winning either when it matters....while you cant predict injuries with bron/ad over the last...
Robinson shot 44% then 47% on solid volume, how is beasley better? as for beasley def, last night gm says otherwise. Beasley may not have...
and Duncan Robinson? dont really consider his laker tenure as small sample sz and his defense is embarrassingly bad
Beasley was relatively same type of player in utah as you noted @abeer3....hes not hitting shots here, dont make any difference what he "use" to be
no way anyone can call the last 3yrs team a "championship" team, expecting bron/ad to stay relatively healthy for the season seems low likely hood
this team isnt even .500 and saying if ad/bron are Healthy seems a reach after last 3 seasons
not trading AD is certainly NOT a no brainer, if we can get kd or gobert type return, it should be seriously considered
[ATTACH] BALLER!
cause beasley can chuck up volume 3s in ways others cannot
i didnt see him being engaged on O, 15 shots as the star player?
n teams regret it soon after, mia with Duncan, Was with Bertans n Nets with Harris....as for Beasley being "able" to do those things doesn't mean...
if we need lebron out there for ad to be good what happens when bron retires?
but he wasn't struggling shooting wise
dlo wasn't struggling today
way to makeup for Dall gm :ADGlance:
you'd think AR was the star that has a max contract
