They might get in foul trouble on occasion, but they would put opposing wings in foul trouble regularly.
It's true Kobe wouldn't have flinched. He also wouldn't have flashed.
Iggy is the Warriors MVP so far.
That's what happens when stuff is Made in China.
Great read that I had missed. Thanks for posting it. Ryan will follow Mitch. This is a kid that grew up in a home where the color green was...
You need dream therapy! I was the conductor on the Towns train, but that baby is derailed, and Okafor is the new high speed rail system. Gotta...
NOOOOOooooOOOOO!!! I'm holding on to Okafor. I would not trade him for a known talented headcase + an unknown Euro. Okafor will be the next...
:nerd: The thing is, we are drafting Okafor, and Chandler can't play the 4 next to him. Time for you to make the mental adjustment and start team...
That's a kind way to say what needed to be said. Ford is a Numbskull.
Me. I like Chandler, IF we are one defensive big away from a deep playoff run. But signing him eats most of our precious cap we need for Carroll...
Didn't Mitch get interest from teams back when he was Logo's assistant? Be patient young padawan Ryan. Do not go to the cowtown dark side.
Dang it. I would have a hard time picking Towns over Okafor now that I've read up on him and listened to him.
Just as well. I get the FO may want a NAME, but we really need a 3&D SF more than anything else.
I hear people say all the time that the shot is the easiest thing to fix, but I don't know who decided that was the case. I can't think of too...
I'd be as happy as a pig in slop with either RHJ or JA if we can move up a few spots. But if I had to choose I would take JA because the 3 ball is...
Now you're just teasing me.
JR doing work! [IMG]
Really good info in this interview so I'm posting the text. Okafor Ready to Play With the Pros Back when Jahlil Okafor was a 17-year-old junior...
Even then, he starts at SF. Kid will start.
Just read an article saying that when GSWs win that their championship will have an asterisk because it's like 5 on 1.
