i was responding to the idea that he should play instead of bogut. i think that's crazy. put him in the jv until somebody gets hurt.
smaller crappy contract + expiring for anderson + protected 1st = done. plenty of teams would jump at that. houston was trying to get someone to...
32 wins? would it really make a difference? we're not sniffing the playoffs. 1. we don't actually know that. 2. if we did, it was because we...
basketball-wise, cousins is a great fit anywhere. it's getting really troubling that his teams can't win, though. he's playing with anthony...
lol, i'm actually arguing two points on either side: 1. randle hasn't proven to be a core-worthy player. 2. i wouldn't trade randle (or...
he's just not knocking down shots. the rest of his game looks fine to me. if we're upset about him defending in space, that's on our coaching...
i'm making perfect sense. they had james harden established as an in-his-prime allstar before anyone would look at them. how did they get him?...
i've been on board since preseason. he won the starting pf spot with his physicality, effort, and hoop iq. some of our other players could learn...
i think the conversation has circled back around. you're only giving up the core if you think randle, clarkson, and ingram are foundational type...
bogut knows his role and plays it. set screens, deliver hard fouls around the basket, grab boards, make passes within the offense. zu came in...
ok, for ariza and eric gordon and junk. who cares? point is, my scenario is totally possible and more probably than joining our 28-win outfit...
same reason some of us are still annoyed about the russell trade: you do this AFTER you get the big fish, not IN ORDER TO get the big fish.
i don't think okafor is beyond recovery, but i'm offering next to nothing. i don't think he's got a good head on his shoulders. if you're glad...
even when his three was missing, it looked good. sort of like even when randle or stan johnson's three is falling, it looks bad. kuzma's got...
i'm not a lonzsexual, and even i have a hard time imagining a circumstance wherein he's not the starting pg.
it's not occurring to folks that perhaps his production is great BECAUSE his minutes are low?
nance is playing great. i would not be cutting his minutes.
that's about the best game i could have expected from this team. hopefully, it's not the last.
if he wants to earn more minutes, last night was how NOT to do that.
i think they've found his minutes and role--question is whether he's ok with it.
