I’m sure his representative is asking for that.Thats his job working for AR.What he eventually gets is probably something different.
source is definitely the agent, probably meaning we've already indicated we'd like to sign him for less. the dance begins.
His max is 41 mil in year 1. I think his contract amount is much less of a concern versus the LeBron contract
My basketball fandom is hanging by a thread already, if they let my boy go I might be here less than I already am
Why don’t we go on record with the amount you believe Reaves first year contract will be and the max number you would support. I think he will sign for between 35 to 37 million and I would be ok with signing him up to 41 million.
i'm fine up to max, but hoping for something closer to 35 just for flexibility. again, i'd take max descending as a compromise, but 35 escalating is basically 5/200 and max descending is only 180 total, if my math is right. 5 years flat at 40 per could also make some sense. i feel like 200 million guaranteed should be enough. brunson took 4/156, which is pretty close in AAV, and i'd point to that if i'm on the lakers side of the negotiating table.
For what it's worth, Irwin said the Hawks have a lot of interest in Austin. In May, Amick listed them and the Jazz as the two teams with known interest in him. Seems their interest in Austin has carried over through multiple changes in the front office in ATL. Their interest dates back to when we were talking to them about Murray.
isn't his max of 25% of cap just 41 mil? Feels like we are making a bigger deal than it is. Some are saying max of 40, but 1 mil isn't going to make a difference in your lineup. It's not even a minimum level player. Maybe a 2 way contract lol. If he took 35m, sure you can get another usable rotation player, but a difference maker? Not so sure about that. We need to improve from within, be healthy, and make some seriously savvy moves (Sign/Trade/Draft/Waived players, etc) Bron likely isn't going anywhere for the huge paycut he'd have to take, and leave the LA market. I just don't see it.
They have an interesting squad after ditching Trae. Could be a good career move for him. So if Reaves takes another offer, do we keep Lebron, or do we move on to a complete retooling? Maybe offer him a sign and trade to where he wants to go and get him overpaid for another year or two. You can argue with Reaves we aren't going to win it all, but we surely aren't without him. If we don't keep him, I'm not sure keeping Lebron remains priority number 1. Glad I'm not a NBA GM